Wednesday, March 21, 2007

The Best of Days and the Worst of Days Today I w...


The Best of Days and the Worst of Days

Today I was given fabulous news from a client who was headed home with her new baby boy. A wonderful adoption story from a couple who had just lived through every adoptive couple's worst nightmare. Finally, they are parents of a newborn and are headed home to start life as a family.
Today I also heard the worst news from this couples former attorney who advised me that the baby they thought they were once going be raising to adulthood was just returned to his drug addict, birth mother.
The couple I'm sure does not know this news, and I will not be the one to divulge it to them. I am also sure that at some point they will hear about this.
Their story is unfortunately not uncommon in this country where the birth mother changed her mind after signing over her child for adoption. The couple lost thousands of dollars and were dragged into a court proceeding where they were villainized by a system bent on protecting the natural bond between parent and child, even if this bond is tainted with cocaine.
Birthmom was an addict during pregnancy and continued her addiction after the birth. Birthmom lied to a court of law and was rewarded instead of punished for her destructive behavior.

I grieve for this child. He enters a house full of second hand smoke, just waiting to taint his young lungs. The cocaine which he will have easy access to waits like patient lover to devour him and give him the comfort he will ultimately need to get from somewhere. The people in his life will mold his young mind into thinking that the only way to get through the day is with drugs . His mother's attitude of entitlement will shape his view of society wherein he will not be looking to give back, but take what he can. The two siblings he will share a home with are already tainted by their parentage. Their father is a felon recently released from prison after serving time for child molestation. Will this man be a part of this child's life as he visits with his children in the mother's home? this child has 4 half siblings who are located throughout the county with different guardians. Will he every have a relationship with any of these siblings? Should he? Child protective services is a regular caller at his mother's address, will he think such visits are a normal part of growing up?

Will he ever know a normal family life? We know he will never have a father, his birthmother has taken care of that. His birth father wants nothing to do with either of them and has a family of his own.

I celebrate for the child who has found a family. I grieve for the child who lost his family.

To the judge, the law guardian and all the players who failed that child,knowing his best interests would not be served; Shame on you. Shame on your system. Sleep well.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Adoption Nightmares/Scams Recently on Dr.Phil t...



Adoption Nightmares/Scams

Recently on Dr.Phil there was a two part series on adoption scams. After living through an adoption nightmare I never realized that this was such a common problem across the country. Couples who are interested in adopting a child are often seen by these scam artists as vulnerable prey. The decision to give a child up for adoption is not one which should be taken lightly and once that decision is made and funds are exchanged it should be difficult for the birth parent to change their mind. Many of these changes of heart result in only heartbreak for the adoptive parents and in many cases significant financial losses. Using the promise of a child or infant, a group of unsuspecting couples recently brought their story to the Dr. Phil show. The promise was really all that truly existed in that there never was a child available for adoption. The woman in question lied about her pregnant condition and kept in touch with a number of couples, promising them all the child at the end of the bogus pregnancy. In one case at least money changed hands and in many instances "gifts" were sent to this scam artist. Apparently this individual operated this scam for at least a 5 year period before anyone tried to expose her. It is unclear at this juncture whether or not criminal charges have finally been leveled against her, but at the time none of the parties had instituted same. Many of these women were told that the "baby" they would be adopting had in fact been lost in a miscarriage. The couples had already decorated nurseries; purchased baby clothes and generally committed themselves to a child that never existed. When did the wonderful concept of adoption turn into such a wonderful opportunity for fraud? In surfing the net it is apparent that there is a large group dedicated to the rights of the birth parent. The group purports to defend the rights of the poor birth parent whom they assume in any adoption situation has been taken advantage of by adoptive parents who have money to fight costly legal battles to keep a child in the event the mother changes her mind. In truth the judicial system bends over backwards for a natural parent and the "poor" birth mother is often given free legal representation while the adoptive parents spend thousands in legal fees.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Open Adoption Records; A Positive Change? The U....

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Open Adoption Records; A Positive Change?

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that they will not stand in the way of adult adoptees receiving copies of their original birth certificates, complete with birth parent names. On June 12, 2000, the full U.S. Supreme Court denied a motion to stay a new Oregon law allowing adult adoptees to receive copies of their original birth certificates. Tenessee recently had joined the states of Alaska, Delaware, Oregon, and Alabama in allowing adult access to birth records.

What Does This Mean for the Adoptive Family?

Many of us who adopt have the fear that reconnection with birth relatives will damage our own relationships with our children. However, while there's little hard research about this, anecdotal evidence suggests that relationships in the adoptive family are actually strengthened when an adoptee searches with the adoptive parent's blessing and support.

Two adult adoptees that I know had very different ideas and experiences with regard to their birth families. One good friend of mine actually located her birth mother only to be rebuffed by her and asked not to contact her again. A relative of mine has confided in me that she never had to the need to search out her birth family and couldn't explain why she never had any desire to do so.

My daughter was not adopted in this country; therefore the above new laws will not apply to her. I have always said however, that if she wanted to travel to Russia to find out what she could, that I not only wouldn't stand in her way, but I would help her and travel with her. I like most other adoptive mothers I love my daughter as if I gave her life. She is and always will be a part of me. As with my older children and their new step mother, I do not worry that their love for me will be diminished. I am grateful that they have someone else in their lives who loves them. My only concern is that if my daughter does find her birth family that the experience is a positive one unlike my friend who discovered that "Mom" never wanted to be found.

Sunday, February 4, 2007

The Day The President Waved to My Daughter At le...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The Day The President Waved to My Daughter

At least once a year we treat our children to a day in the city complete with a Broadway show and dinner out. We try to pack as much into the day as we can and yesterday was no exception. We were equipped with tickets to the Bodies Exhibit at the South Street Seaport and our day was well planned. It started fine with us parking our vehicle across from the theater and flagging down a cab. My husband put myself, my daughter and one son in cab with instructions to take us to the South Street Seaport. I began to get a little concerned as I overheard the cab driver repeat over and over into his headphones the words "south street seaport" along with a rapid flow of unrecognizable non-english words. My son whispered to me that we had just made a u-turn and proceeded in the opposite direction that my husband had informed me we had to go. A few minutes later my cell phone rang and the voice of my other son, the one who went with Dad, was earnestly asking where we were. I found out that they had already arrived leaving much after we had and beckoned the cab driver to tell me how much further. The meter already read the fair my husband said he paid to arrive at our destination and there was no seaport in sight out my window. After a few more tense minutes and an inordinate amount of traffic, the driver advised me that he had gone a different way than my husband had advised and we were now stuck behind a barricade because the president was in town. We had arrived at Battery Park and he told us to "pay the meter and get out and walk." Furious that I had not arrived anywhere near our destination and with my husband yelling in my ear to find another cab, I told the driver I would not get out of the cab without first speaking to a police officer. He flagged one over who told him he could have gone the other way to take me to the seaport, but a second policeman told me the walk really wasn't that bad. With that advise and direction we exited the cab but not without first giving this cab driver a piece of my mind. Along the way, I had read the "Passengers Bill of Rights" which was listed in the back of the cab. I was informed that I was entitled to a driver who knew the geography of the city,spoke in english and took me the most direct route possible. In my mind this driver failed on at least two counts. He took us the most round about way possible and should have known that the President was speaking in this part of town and avoided it at all costs. Instead, he drove us right into the blockade, charged us an exorbitant fee and failed to get us to our destination. I screamed that he should be ashamed of himself as he countered "It's not my fault." I literally threw him his fare without tip, and proceeded as directed through the park up to Pearl Street. I stopped a few knowing individuals on the street to make sure I was heading in the right direction and with my husband in my ear we proceeded up the block. Again we were stopped at the corner of Pearl and a block near Wall Street that I can't recall. We were unable to cross the street because the Presidential Motorcade was due any time now. Our 2:00 appointment loomed ahead as my husband and two other children headed toward us from Pearl street in the opposite direction. The police were annoyed because they were being yelled at by the pedestrians stuck in a holding pattern. Businessmen who ran out for lunch or coffee without coats were trying to keep themselves warm and of course we ended up right next to the loudest, filthiest mouth woman in the city. Trying to shield my child from her ranting we finally were granted a reprieve as the motorcade made its way down the road. Right in front of us was the presidential vehicle and waving to my little purple snowsuit girl was the President himself. Less than five minutes later we were on our way and met up with the rest of my family up the block. We made it to the exhibit by 2:00 and enjoyed a really fantastic day. We found a van cab to get us back to the theater district and with all six of us in the car it cost us half the price I paid to end up in Battery Park. Well, now I have learned that Pearl Street takes us right to Fulton Street. But my daughter now has a story to tell her her friends; which she promptly forgot to do her first day back at school!

Monday, January 29, 2007

A Secret Blogger Visited Me I had no idea my name...

A Secret Blogger Visited Me

I had no idea my name would be given to a secret blogger. As I was roaming the blogosphere as I do reading adoption blogs, I can across the Secret Blogger idea and became intrigued. I volunteered to cheer up someone in the throws of this delightful but stressful endeavor since I had gone through it myself. I had explained to the founders of the idea that I would be glad to be an encourager since now with 4 children living at home I am done with reproducing or adopting. Well this week I received an email and then an amazon e-card and gift card from my secret blogger. What an unexpected treat!! First, I only shop from Amazon.com in that I hate physically going shopping, and second I am a computer freak! Just ask my family. Thank you secret blogger pal. I can't wait to chat with you and share our experiences.

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Secret Blog Pals Running through the blogasphere...


Secret Blog Pals


Running through the blogasphere is a new phenomena I discovered called Secret Blog Pals. In the adoption community this was developed by two bloggers to help encourage and keep the spirits up of all those embarking on this endeavor. It sounds like a wonderful idea and I opted to join in the fun this round. It is anonymous which tends to make communication with your blog pal a bit of a challenge. The idea is to encourage without being found out. Comments to the bloggers website and snail mail greetings are encouraged as I have been told emails from the accounts of others which cannot be traced back to you. I have some books I will be mailing my blog pal and hope that the anonymous comments I made on her site help her out. Since I am through with my adoption adventure I volunteered to merely be one who encourages. As you all know from reading this blog I am an ardent supporter of Adoption and will talk about it to anyone who will give me an ear!

I wish I could speak with my secret pal directly in that I know she has been going through a rough time and wish I could tell her my stories and perhaps give her some insight as to why certain things have happened to her. Anyone interested in getting involved can read about this at http://www.russianbrown.blogspot.com. And to my friend Jen http://threesons.clubmom.com/three_sons who is just returning with her Pineapple Princess this week....I am thinking of you girlfriend; Enjoy every crazy minute and be sure to document it all when you get back; you daughter will LOVE reading about it someday. Here is to all the secret blog pals out there; may all your dreams come true.....soon!



Thursday, January 4, 2007

OH Oklahoma! What Were You Thinking?? The 10th C...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
OH Oklahoma! What Were You Thinking??

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments examining the constitutionality of the Oklahoma Adoption Invalidation Law. The Act, passed in 2004, would ban state officials from recognizing a same-sex adoption. Same-sex couples anywhere with legally adopted children would lose their status as parents when inside Oklahoma. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma struck down the law in May, finding that the law "By its refusal to recognize and give effect to a valid judgment, from another court of competent jurisdiction, which established their status as parents of their respective children, the Amendment violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause and substantive due process rights."
Interesting that Oklahoma feels it has the power to invalidate a law made by any state in the union. So this technically would mean that if a same sex couple and their children were involved in an auto accident while passing through the state of Oklahoma and all parties were rushed to a local hospital; the parents would have no authority to decide upon the children's medical treatment since in effect in the state of Oklahoma they are not legal guardians of these children but mere strangers! How absurd! If Oklahoma wants to ban same sex couple adoption the way Florida has, than so be it. It is there right to do so. However, as part of a union of united states, they DO Not have the right to invalidate any other states laws just because a party steps on their soil! It seems the Oklahoma state legislature and their governor who signed this into law think they are the rulers of their own fiefdom. Not so Oklahoma, as a resident of another state I am aghast at your gaul. If Oklahoma were to be allowed to get away with invalidating any other state's law what a mess this country will become. Each state will retaliate and nullify the state law of their choosing and people will be afraid to leave their own home state for fear of breaking the law of a sister state just by setting foot across a boarder. We are one country..Do you hear that Oklahoma?? Shame on you for instigating the start of another civil war. You have broken a Federal law with your arrogance and I'm sure you will be shot down. One Nation....Under God; Indivisible. It is your constitution too.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Domestic Adoption The increasing role of the birt...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Domestic Adoption
The increasing role of the birth family

Recently an agency has been brought to my attention indicating that they deal with states who have little to no revocation laws regarding adoption. Finding it difficult to believe I went on their website and then researched the laws of the states they utilize. While it is true there are some states that have virtually no revocation provisions meaning, once the documents are signed and/or the child is turned over to the adoptive family, the birth mother can no longer change her mind. All statues in all states however, have a provision allowing revocation in the event of fraud of duress. Such is the fodder of the adoption lawsuits which paper the country. Additionally, the agency in question claims to foster a positive and "close" relationship between the adoptive family and the birth mother. This may be the way of the future of adoptions in this country but in my mind it is not the preferred method of adoption. I for one pray for the birth mother of my adopted child and bless her and thank her for my wonderful daughter. But I am not interested in having her as a part of our lives. Call me selfish, cruel or uncaring,but in my mind, her role in my daughter's life ended on the 6th day of my child's life when she put her in an orphanage. My beautiful child spent the next 15 months of her life, starving for food and attention not to mention mental stimulation. In the six years we have her, she has become healthy, happy and the joy of our lives. It was a lot of work and still is, to get her where she should be at this point in time, and I have no desire to share her. Of course my child is fully aware of the fact that she is adopted and that we traveled around the world to get her. Make no mistake I will also give her any and all information she needs if she chooses to try to find her birth family when she is older. In fact I have already told my husband I will travel with her if she wants. For now though, let me enjoy her without sharing...Russia is a lot further than Oklahoma and frankly I like it that way.

Thursday, November 30, 2006

The Hague Convention New Rules 2007 The hot news ...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The Hague Convention
New Rules 2007

The hot news in international adoption at this juncture is the implementation of the Hague Convention Treaty set up to safeguard international adoptions. Major Advantages of the Convention and Its Implementation as per the State Department website states:

Provides, for the first time, formal international and intergovernmental recognition of intercountry adoption.
Recognizes intercountry adoption, as defined and treated by the Convention, as a means of offering the advantage of a permanent family to a child for whom a suitable family has not been found in the childÂ’s country of origin.
Establishes a set of internationally agreed minimum requirements and procedures uniformly to govern intercountry adoptions in which a child moves from one Convention party country to another.
Requires that countries party to the Convention establish a Central Authority to be the authoritative source of information and point of contact in that country, to carry out certain functions, to cooperate with other Central Authorities, and to ensure effective implementation of the Convention in the United States.
Provides a means for ensuring that adoptions made pursuant to the Convention will generally be recognized and given effect in other party countries.
Facilitates the adoption by U.S. adoptive parents of children from other party countries through an expanded category of children, safeguarded by the Convention, who will qualify for immigration and automatic naturalization in the United States.
Certain countries have already been apart of this treaty, however to date the United States was not.
That meant that international adoption previously was conductedthroughh the foreign country and the United States had very little to do with the adoption except with regard to INS approval. Now agencies who have previously worked only with foreign governments to procure these adoptions need to deal with the US government as well.
What does this mean to the average adoptive couple? Another layer of government has been added to the mix,bringing with it the usual additionalbureaucraticc requirements and additional paperwork andproceduress not yet outlined. Chances are this new wrinkle will slow down adoptions somewhat as agencies and the new governmental agency will need to feel there way through uncharted waters for a while until they have established a firm policy.
The good news is of course, there are many more safeguards in place for the adoptive family enabling them to recoup lost money in the event an adoption falls through and in fact make it such that adoptions should no longer fall through the cracks. As the agencies scramble to insure that all goes smoothly with theirclientelel the actual additional requirements will not be known for a while. The best advice is to find an agency already accredited internationally and begin the application process as soon as possible. There is a good chance that applications in process may be exempt from the new additional paperwork, but that is yet to be seen. I will keep an eye on this and keep you posted.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

So A Couple Came Into My Office Today.... And I ...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
So A Couple Came Into My Office Today....

And I believe I talked them right out of Private Domestic Adoption. God forgive me if I have done them a disservice but the thought of representing any party again in a private adoption had me ready to hand in my happy law credo and dive back into my divorce trenches. This positively nice couple came in with all intentions of placing an 800 number in the paper and housing and meeting a frail young pregnant woman who wanted her child to have a better life. They were absolutely rosey in their concept of the how this was a wonderful idea of the young woman who may have found herself in a jam and the poor infant who would otherwise have a very difficult childhood. As I forced myself to not start screaming about how you couldn't be sure who to trust and who not to trust and the fact that they could very well be walking right into a con; helping a woman who actually had no intention at all of giving up her child but wanted financial help throughout her pregnancy and then conveniently changes her mind when the infant is produced. Or perhaps just some gold digger who wants to play "How much for that Baby In Utero?" Oh, don't worry, I stopped myself before I lost control and ran screaming from the room. I just very calmly started listing the cons of entering into this time of "agreement" though it is far from an agreement in this country where the baby is the one truly unprotected. I stressed the fact that the relinquishing of the child could not be made until the child was born and that they would have already made a hefty financial and emotional investment by that time. I then segue into the forum of International Adoption. I proceeded to advise them that in this type of adoption the children were usually already free for adoption and there would be no dealing with birth mothers. There are no open adoptions internationally, nor are there negotiations as to fees or expenses. Forgive me I said if I feel very strongly here, but I recently represented a birth mother who is in the process of suing for the child back and has implemented me in the course of this saying I forced her into this process. Of course that is the furthest thing from the truth and in fact, I believe that I was the one duped in all of this. I firmly believe this was a hoax from day one and that myself and the adoptive parents were pawns to this addict (no, I didn't know she was an addict at the time)and I had no plans to put myself in such a position again. International adoption was much more agreeable to me in that my experience was by far the happiest and most rewarding time of my life. This couple left with a new idea and lots of websites and warm fuzzy feelings. Be it China, Russia, Guatemala or the Ukraine anyplace but the United States is the place to go for adoption....Yup just ask my girl....She'll tell you.

Friday, November 3, 2006

International Adoption is Never A Bad Idea My da...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
International Adoption is Never A Bad Idea

My daughter has long blond hair and green eyes. She was 16 months old when we adopted her and was shortly on her way out of the infants hospital we had found her. The chances of adoption after the age of 12 months drastically drops in countries such as Russia, where only healthy infants are desired by the Russian people. Many cannot even afford to take in another child. Once a child in Russia reaches the age of 16 they are turned out into the street to find their own way. Most of the girls turn to prostitution and the boys turn to drugs. China has a similiar story to tell, with the one child rule, the Chinese are unable to adopt their own due to the violation of their country's laws.
Where then, do these purported advocates of these children come off telling everyone including CNN that maybe international adoption is not in the best interests of these children and that perhaps they are better off in their communities. Who is there to raise them in these communities is the questions? No one is the answer. These children are left to beg for their own well being.

Friday, October 27, 2006

The Madonna controversy How Does It Effect Intern...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The Madonna controversy
How Does It Effect International Adoption?

Last night while I was waiting for my son to finish his homework, I got to do something I rarely do which is watch the evening news shows. All the talking heads were alternating between discussing the Michael J. Fox commercials and the Madonna adoption controversy. Of course the one show had a very upset commentator who was an adoptive father was very upset with Madonna for what he claims will ruin it for the rest of us who want to adopt internationally. Of course the controversy revolves around the fact that purportedly the laws for adoption in country of her adoption require the adoptive parents to reside in the country for an 18 month period. That seems a rather onerous task to ask of adoptive parents, but if in fact that is their rule, so be it. However, as the mother of an internationally adoptive child, also know that rules abroad involving adoptions are routinely changed or waived. The judge in our case (as well as the entire group traveling with us) all had the wait period waived. He must have been in a good mood that day. In our case we were told that there could be one to four week wait period before we could leave with the child. We were prepared to leave and come back due to the fact that we left other children at home. We were lucky in our case. Why can't it be Madonna was also lucky? Why wasn't her judge permitted to waive the requirement as was our judge? Is it because she is famous, and her adoption is public news, that she must be forced to a higher standard? I would be interested in seeing if any other adoptive parents were forced to reside for an 18 month period before leaving the country with the child. I would venture to say this "rule" is routinely waived. Isn't it more important that the child will be cared for properly and shouldn't we take into consideration that the child had been in an orphanage from 2 weeks after birth?

I think we need to re-evaluate our priorities and remember that we need to apply a best interest test in dealing with children. Who does the 18 month residency requirement benefit? Clearly not the child, who would thrive with nutritious food and medical care not readily available in his present environment.

We all want to think that the rich get favors you and I never do; but in this case I really don't believe the favor was granted because she bought it. I think the waiver was granted because the child deserved to begin his healthy new life as quickly as possible.

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Happy Law This was supposed to be the area of th...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Happy Law

This was supposed to be the area of the law that made families instead of destroyed them. This is what I bragged to my staff when we entered this field. Silly me, I naturally forgot we were dealing with human nature.

Recently many of my adoption petitions have dealt with step parent adoption. Sometimes there is a parent who cannot be found, that is the easy type. Many times the parent can be found and must be given the right to object. Of course in my experience they always want to object. What ensues of course is then a hearing to see if that particular parent's rights should in fact be terminated. A pretty hefty burden.

Then we have the "I want my baby back." adoption nightmare. Again this is all too common here in the United States where we tend to bend over backwards to protect parental rights most times to the detriment of the children involved. Private adoptions in this country are a never ending source for the Lifetime Movie Network. They bring us all to tears and have helped to increase interest in International Adoptions, where children are free for adoption even before the potential adoptive couple has seen them. Orphanages internationally take abandoned or abused children in and immediately terminate parental rights. Here in the United States because of our individual freedoms and the right to contract; pregnant women enter into agreements all the time with potential adoptive parents who hope at the end of the day the mother signs the documentation required to relinquish her rights and doesn't change her mind. These couples invest time and money into this process while the birth mother can literally coast along being taken care of throughout her pregnancy and choose at the very end to change her mind. Most of these women can not afford to repay the adoptive parents, and although certainly they are entitled to all of the money they expended, as with any other judgement, the trick is in the actual collection. Aside from Private Adoption in this country we have our version of orphanages known as the Foster Care System.

No one can tell me the foster care system in this country is the best way to reconnect a family. Most children placed into the system get stuck there for years while the justice system keeps giving the child's parent yet another chance to clean up their act. Frankly, there should be a higher standard for these parents and the children should be available for adoption sooner than they presently are. Yes, the system has changed a bit and there are supposedly strick timelines in place but young children can still be in foster care for quite a while before they are eligible for adoption; and more importantly their wayward parents are given chance upon chance to show that they are now capable of caring for this child.

So we ask our yuppy and preppy couples to put their lives aside to make room in their hearts and lives for a child in need of a home, only to boldly strip them of this child when the biological parents decide they now want to be a parent. What kind of justice is served by a system which allows a child to reap the benefits of a healthy normal enviorment only to be stripped of that lifestyle once addict Mom or convict Dad decide they are now rehabiliated and want the chance to parent again? Six months or even one year down the road, the child will find themselves on the doorstep of yet another foster home, moved from house to house with only paper bags filled with the few belongings they allow themselves to own due to their constant upheaval. Perhaps the laws should be changed yet again, once a biological parent gives a child up there are "no backsies." A child is not a playing card. Look at the home and the environment not just the biology. The best home should win out, not the similarity of genes. Let's give the children more rights and their parents who should know better, less.

Saturday, October 14, 2006

Parasites; Guardia; Lactose intolerance Reading ...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Parasites; Guardia; Lactose intolerance

Reading through the blogs of my fellow international adoptee parents I see that many of them are experiencing the very problems we did upon our arrival home with my daughter. My daughter loved everything we fed her, however, she had the most explosive and vile smelling bowl movements. We of course had her on soy right from the beginning knowing that lactose intolerance could be a problem and the issue did not abate.

We were a regular at the physicians office her first month home. Dealing with double ear infections, strep throat and what was diagnosed as Guardia. A parasite actually in her intestines which produced this horrendous bowl movement. The course of antibiotics for the removal of this parasite is a vile tasting pink liquid which we basically forced down my child's throat with a liquid syringe type gagit. The parasite which is said to be common in day care environments and especially in countries where the water quality is not up to snuff, usually takes two rounds at least of antibiotic to get out of the system. Once the parasite is gone, however, you child's little tummy is depleted of all the important bacteria it needs to digest non parasital food. Now enter acidophillas. I'm sure I have misspelled it and I even have trouble saying it. This is a health food store powder that has the same ingredients as yogurt.

Eventually her digestive tract normalized and my child was no longer exploding. The next issue she faced was seasonal allergies, but that is another blog for another day.....

Monday, October 9, 2006

The Homestudy There is no set format that adopt...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The Homestudy


There is no set format that adoption agencies use to conduct home studies. They must follow the general regulations of their State, but they have the freedom to develop their own application packet, policies, and procedures within those regulations. Some agencies will have prospective parents attend one or several group orientation sessions or a series of training classes before they complete an application. Others will have their social worker start by meeting with family members individually and then ask that they attend educational meetings later on. Usually agency staff members are glad to answer any questions and to guide applicants through the process.

The home study itself is a written report of the findings of the social worker who has met with the applicants on several occasions, both individually and together, usually at the social worker's office. At least one meeting will occur in the applicant's home. If there are other people living in the home, they also will be interviewed by the social worker
On average the home study process takes three to six months to complete, but it can take longer through public agencies or less time through non-licensed facilitators. The home study process, the contents of the written home study report, and the time it will take to complete vary from State to State and from agency to agency. In general, the following information is included in the home study:

Personal and family background-including upbringing, siblings, key events, and what was learned from them.
Significant people in the lives of the applicants
Marriage and family relationships
Motivation to adopt
Expectations for the child
Feelings about infertility (if this is an issue)
Parenting and integration of the child into the family
Family environment
Physical and health history of the applicants
Education, employment and finances-including insurance coverage and child care plans if needed
References and criminal background clearances
Summary and social worker's recommendation.

The following sections will describe typical information or activities that will be required of families who want to adopt:

Autobiographical Statement
The autobiographical statement can be intimidating, but it is essentially the story of your life. Most agencies have a set of guidelines that detail the kind of information they require to assist you in writing the autobiography, and others have the worker assist you directly. You may be asked to describe who reared you and their style of child rearing, how many brothers and sisters you have, and where you are in the birth order.
Your statement may answer many questions. Were you close to your parents and siblings when you were a child; are you close now; how much contact do you have with them? What are some successes or failures that you have had? What educational level have you reached; do you plan to further your education; are you happy with your educational attainments; what do you think about education for a child? What is your employment status; your employment history; do you have plans to change employment; do you like your current job?

If you are married, there will be questions about your marriage. These may cover how you met, how long you dated before you married, how long you have been married, what attracted you to each other, what your spouse's strengths and weaknesses are, and the issues on which you agree and disagree in your marriage. Others may ask how you make decisions, solve problems, settle arguments, communicate, express feelings, and show affection. If you were married before, there will be questions about that marriage. If you are single, there will be questions about your social life and how you anticipate integrating a child into it, as well as questions about your network of supportive relatives and friends.

In your statement, you will probably describe your ordinary routines, such as your typical weekday or weekend, your hobbies and interests, and your leisure time activities. You may also describe your plans for childcare if you work outside the home. There will be questions that cover your experiences with children, relatives' children, neighbors, volunteer work, babysitting, teaching, or coaching. You might be asked some "what if" questions regarding discipline or other parenting issues
You will probably be asked about your neighborhood: How friendly are you with your neighbors? What kind of people live nearby? Is it a safe area? Why did you pick this neighborhood? Are you located conveniently to community resources, such as medical facilities, recreational facilities, shopping areas, and religious facilities? And you will be asked about religion, your level of religious practice, and what kind of religious upbringing (if any) you will give the child.

There may also be a section on specific adoption-related issues, including questions about why you want to adopt, what kind of child you feel you can best parent and why, how you will tell the child he or she is adopted and when, what you think of birth parents who make an adoption plan for their child, how you will handle relatives' and friends' questions about adoption, and whether you can bond to a child not genetically related to you.

You may not know all these answers right away! A home study is supposed to help you think through these issues. Hopefully, the social worker guiding you through the home study process will offer advice on describing these topics.

You will be asked to provide a copy of your birth certificate, your marriage license or certificate, and your divorce decree, if applicable.

Health Statements
Most agencies require a physical exam of prospective adoptive parents, or at least a current tuberculosis test (X-ray or scratch test). Some agencies that only place infants with infertile couples require that the physician verify the infertility. Others just want to know that you are essentially healthy, have a normal life expectancy, and are able to physically and emotionally handle the care of a child. If you have a medical condition, but are under a doctor's care and it is under control (for instance, high blood pressure or diabetes that is controlled by diet and medication), you can probably still be approved as an adoptive family. A serious health problem that affects life expectancy may prevent approval.

Income Statement
Usually, you are asked to verify your income by providing a copy of your paycheck stub(s), a copy of a W-4 form, or an income tax form (1040 or 1040 EZ). You will be asked about your savings, insurance policies, and other investments and debts, including your monthly mortgage or rent payment, car and charge account payments, etc. This helps determine your general financial stability. You do not have to be rich to adopt; you just have to show that you can manages your finances responsibly and adequately.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Hosting A Child; Testing the Waters of Internatio...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Hosting A Child; Testing the Waters of International Adoption
Family Builders Finding a Forever Family

Recently I met a lovely family who called themselves international adoption "facilitators" specializing in Ukrainian adoptions. When I adopted my daughter from Russia over 5 years ago I called my "facilitators" angels. In the world of adoption that is indeed what they are. This family of facilitators tries to put together a number of families interested in "hosting" an international child(who by the way is already free for adoption) for a three week period. During the host period the family is asked if they would be interested in adopting the child they are hosting.
Children deemed appropriate for the rigors in international travel and who are or will soon be free for adoption are selected by their orphanage director and Ukrainian coordinator. The children are free of communicable diseases and they have been vaccinated according to American standards. The children are escorted throughout the flight by an interpreter who is available to the host families. Most of these children do not speak English, but over the course of the next three weeks the families and these children some how manage to communicate. Children who are age 5 or older and legally free for adoption are given preference to families who have had a previous and positive contact with them. In general, Ukrainian people are not interested in the adoption of "older" children, although as in Russia the Ukrains and the Russians are given first priority over Americans interested in adopting a particular child. The child is also given the opportunity do decide whether or not he/she wants to be adopted by the host family, but most times the decision is mutual.
In order to host a child a mini home study or completed home study is required; 2 letters of recommendation (from non family members) police clearance, and the completion of an online course on "Hosting Children From Abroad."

These American Angels have made connections in the Ukraine with facilitators who are experienced and well liked by the directors of the orphages in the region.
Hosting a child is an excellent way for families to decide whether or not international adoption is right for them. What better way to alleviate fear than to experience the joy of having child in your home and being a part of your daily lives. Even if the family chooses to by pass the adoption experience, the experience they have given this child and the effect it will have on their own family in years to come is priceless.
Family Builders can be emailed at linnpenn21@optonline.net or contacted at 631-751-0758.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

National Adoption Day or Gotcha Day I was inform...


National Adoption Day or Gotcha Day

I was informed this week that on or about September 19 was National Adoption Day. I attempted to verify that date but at this writing was unable to do so. I do however, know all about "Gotcha Day". This is the term used by many in the adoption community as the name of the day the parents of an adopted child either take home their new child, or finalize the adoption. It is used interchangeably or at the family's whim in symbolizing for them the day they all became a family. It is sort of like an "unbirthday" a day not your birthday that you celebrate like it is your birthday. Unbirthdays are especially useful for Christmas babies, who feel they get shortchanged by getting presents for the holiday and having people call it also a birthday gift.

When we "got" my daughter we started to celebrate "gotcha day" until it seemed like "gotcha day" was every day! I wanted to just keep celebrating our new family and we eventually settled on her birthday for our big celebrations.

Recently I saw some adoption magazines making reference to "gotcha day" and saying that the term was no longer PC and now carried with it a negative connotation of sorts. I am still trying to rationalize what the negative connotation could be but fail to come up with anything. Any celebration that makes a family feel good should be embraced. Afterall isn't that why we have celebrations throughout the year? My children are convinced that we are multi cultural because we celebrate just about every holiday on the calendar and attempt to learn about the history and heritage of the particular event. We have had Passover sedars in my home; we never fail to celebrate Cinco de Mayo; St. Patricks Day always involves corned beef and recently one of my children asked that we investigate Kwanza for a possible inclusion into our celebratory calendar.

So whether you were born this week as was my latest client, or you are celebrating a "gotcha day" event, as is the same client; Happy, Happy, Enjoy!

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Making the Decision to Place Your Child For Adopt...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Making the Decision to Place Your Child For Adoption

The decision to place a child for adoption is not only a life altering decision it is one decision which cannot be reversed. I came across this questionaire designed to help a birth mother decide whether or not adoption is right for them. I took some liberties in adding some of my own questions and tayloring the ones that I found based on some of my clients concerns. I hope those of you who may be considering this as an option find these helpful.

1. Is it ok to keep in mind what is good for myself as well as the baby?

2. Am I making this decision or is someone else?

3. Am I usuing responsible logic to make this decision or am I rebelling against or yielding to someone else's desires?

4. How will this decision affect my family? Should I involve them?

5. Do other people's feelings matter in making this decision?

6. How much should I listen to friends, family, community acquaintances and the birth father?

7. What are the feeling I have about my decision? Guild, pride, fear, relief?

8. Does having and raising a child fit the lifestyle I want?

9. Could I handle a child(another child) and a job at the same time?

10. Would I be ready to cut back my social life and spend more time at home?

11. Would I miss my free time and privacy?

12. Could I afford to suppor a child(another child)?

13. Do I really know how much it takes to raise a child?
(to answer this question make a list of furniture, clothing, toys, food, diapers etc..that you will need for a child and price them)

14. Do I want to raise a child in the neighborhood where I live now? If not,would I be willing and able to move?

15.Would a child change my education plans?

16. Do I have the energy and the money to go to school and raise a child at the same time?

17. Am I willing to give a great part of my life-at least 18 years- to being responsible for a child and spend a large portion of my life being concerned about my child's well being?

18. Am I ready to put a child's needs before my own?

19.Do I like doing things with children? Do I enjoy activites that children do?

20. Would I want my child to acheive things I wish I had, but didn't?

21. Would I expect my child to keep me from being lonely in my old age?

22. Do I expect my child to make my life happy?

23. Do I like children?

24. When I'm around children for a while, do I wish I could have a child around all the time?

25. Do I enjoy teaching others?

26. Do I want to give a child the love he/she needs? Is loving easy for me?

27. Am I patient enough to deal with the noise and the confusion and the 24 hour a day responsibility?

28. What kind of time and space do I need for myself?

29. What do I do when I get angry or upset? Would I be likely to lose control and hit a child?

30. What does discipline mean to me?

31. Whad does freedom, setting limits, or giving space mean?

32. What is being too strict or not strict enough?

33. Would I want the perfect child?

34. How do I get along with my parents? What will I do to avoid the mistakes my parents made?

35. How would I take care of my child's health and safety? How do I take care of my own?

36. What if I keep a child and find out I made the wrong decision?

37. Will I be able to respond to a child's medical emergencies and care for the child?

38. Does my partner want to have a child? Have we talked about the reasons?

39. Could we give a child a good home? Is our relationship a happy and strong one?

40 Are we both ready to give our time and energy to raising a child?

41. Could we share our love with a child without jealousy?

42. What will happen if we separated after having a child, or if one of us should die?

43. Do my partner and I understand each other's feelings aboutreligion, work, family, child raising, future goals? Will children fit into these feelings, hopes and plans?

44. Have I discussed my situation with my family? How do they feel about my becoming a parent? How do they feel about the child being adopted?

Thursday, September 7, 2006

Gay Adoption Like many issues involving sexual o...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Gay Adoption

Like many issues involving sexual orientation, adoption by same-sex couples tends to be a controversial issue. Critics of the practice have long argued that children are harmed when they are not raised in the presence of both a father and a mother. Others have argued that exposure to homosexuality at a young age can potentially harm a child's development and maturity regarding gender roles or sexuality in general.

Supporters of adoption by same-sex couples argue that loving same-sex couples can be just as effective parents as opposite-sex couples. They say that statistics do not indicate that children raised by same-sex couples are any more likely to be affected by social problems. While some studies have shown that children raised by same-sex couples are likely to have sightly different views about gender roles than their peers, supporters note that such children are not more likely to be gay or lesbian themselves later in life.

The American Psychological Association supports adoption by same-sex couples in its policy statement of July 28 & 30, 2004

Adoption by same-sex couples is legal in Andorra, Belgium, England and Wales, Iceland, the Netherlands, Sweden, South Africa, and Spain. Denmark, Germany and Norway allow "stepchild-adoption" so that the partner in a civil union can adopt the natural (or sometimes even adopted) child of his partner. In the Republic of Ireland and some other countries, individual persons, whether heterosexual/homosexual, cohabiting/single may apply for adoption.

In February 2006, France's Court of Cassation ruled that both partners in a same-sex relationship can have parental rights over one partner's biological child. The result came from a case where a woman tried to give parental rights of her two daughters to her partner whom she was in a civil union with.[2]

On June 2, 2006 the Icelandic Parliament voted for a proposal accepting adoption, parenting and assisted insemination treatment for same-sex couples on the same basis as heterosexual couples. No member of the parliament voted against the proposal. The law went into effect on June 27, 2006.

In the United States, only one state, Florida, totally bans gay adoption.


Nine states allow for openly gay and lesbian couples to adopt jointly:
California
Massachusetts
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Ohio
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
as well as D.C.
It is more common for one partner to adopt and then for the second to apply as the second parent, or co-parent. Second parent adoptions creates a second legally recognized parent for the adoptive children. This is the only way for gay couples to both become legal parents of their children. Second parent adoptions have been granted by the courts in twenty-one states as well as D.C. These states include - Alabama, Alaska, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, and Washington.

The bulk of evidence to date indicates that children raised by gay and lesbian parents are no more likely to become homosexual than children raised by heterosexuals. As one researcher put it. "If heterosexual parenting is insufficient to ensure that children will also be heterosexual, then there is no reason to conclude that children of homosexuals also will be gay."

Studies asking the children of gay fathers to express their sexual orientation showed the majority of children to be heterosexual, with the proportion of gay offspring similar to that of a random sample of the population. An assessment of more than 300 children born to gay or lesbian parents in 12 different samples shows no evidence of "significant disturbances of any kind in the development of sexual identity among these individuals".

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Top 5 Reasons to Re-Adopt Your Internationally Ad...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Top 5 Reasons to Re-Adopt Your Internationally Adopted Child Once Back in the US

While it is true that if a child enters the country under an IR-3 visa, he/she will be a U.S. citizen thanks to the Child Citizenship Act of 2000, but there are still good reasons for re-adoption once back in the U.S.A. I constantly tell my clients that the re-adoption process though technically unnecessary will only serve to make life easier years down the line. If the re-adoption paperwork is done as soon as the family arrives back in the country most of the documents such as the homestudy can be used in the re-adoption. Here are some of the reasons I site to my clients in applauding re-adoptions:


1) A Legal & Binding U.S. Birth Certificate
Whether your child is getting a driver's license or adopting one day, your child will need a copy of her birth certificate at different points in her lifetime. It would be much easier for your child to seek a copy of her birth certificate through your state's department of vital records than try to get one (if it still exists) in her birth country.

2) A Legal Name Change Can Be Completed If you desire to have your child's name legally changed, re-adoption is the time to complete this change.

3) Not all U.S. States Will Recognize a Foreign Adoption Decree
There are eighteen states and the District of Columbia, and four U.S. Territories that have no statutory provisions regarding international adoptions. These include:
Alabama
Arizona
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New York
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Utah
Virginia
West Virginia
Wyoming
American Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico
U.S. Virgin Islands

4) So, You Live in a State that Recognizes Foreign Adoptions - What if You Move?If you happen to move into one of the above mentioned states that do not recognize a foreign adoption decree there could be trouble. For example, your child may not be seen as a legal heir.

5) Re-adoption Is Another Reason to Have a Party!
Re-adoption gives you another day to plan an event to celebrate your child's adoption.
Re-adoption may be a hassle, but the hassle may be worth it in the long run.